Mutations and Information; Genetic Entropy
All Genetic Mutations when understood to the molecular and morphological level ALL turn out to decrease informationThis video is exerpted from the AiG (Answers In Genesis) DVD called “The Code of Life” by Dr. Georgia Purdom. This DVD explores the fascinating world of DNA and clearly show that “junk” DNA isn’t junk and that mutations and natural selection are headed in the wrong direction, corrupting and decreasing information in DNA making evolution impossible.
The foundational rule of Genetic Entropy for biology can be stated something like this:
All adaptations away from a parent species for a sub-species, which increase fitness to a particular environment, will always come at a loss of the original integrated complex information in the parent species genome.
Professional evolutionary biologists are hard-pressed to cite even one clear-cut example of evolution through a beneficial mutation to DNA that would violate the principle of genetic entropy. Although evolutionists try to claim the lactase persistence mutation as a lonely example of a beneficial mutation in humans, lactase persistence is actually a loss of a instruction in the genome to turn the lactase enzyme off, so the mutation clearly does not violate genetic entropy. Yet at the same time, the evidence for the detrimental nature of mutations in humans is clearly overwhelming, for doctors have already cited over 3500 mutational disorders (Dr. Gary Parker).
“Mutations” by Dr. Gary Parker
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch2-mutations.asp
Mutations: The Raw Material for Evolution?
http://www.icr.org/articles/print/3466/
“It is entirely in line with the al nature of naturally occurring mutations that extensive tests have agreed in showing the vast majority of them to be detrimental to the organisms in its job of surviving and reproducing, just as changes ally introduced into any artificial mechanism are predominantly harmful to its useful operation” H.J. Muller (Received a Nobel Prize for his work on mutations to DNA)
“Mutations, in summary, tend to induce sickness, , or deficiencies. No evidence in the vast literature of heredity change shows unambiguous evidence that random mutation itself, even with geographical isolation of populations leads to speciation.” (Lynn Margulis - Acquiring Genomes [2003], p. 29).
“But there is no evidence that DNA mutations can provide the sorts of variation needed for evolution… There is no evidence for beneficial mutations at the level of macroevolution, but there is also no evidence at the level of what is commonly regarded as microevolution.” Jonathan Wells (PhD. Molecular Biology)
“The neo-Darwinians would like us to believe that large evolutionary changes can result from a series of small events if there are enough of them. But if these events all lose information they can’t be the steps in the kind of evolution the neo-Darwin theory is supposed to explain, no matter how many mutations there are. Whoever thinks macroevolution can be made by mutations that lose information is like the merchant who lost a little money on every sale but thought he could make it up on volume.” Dr. Lee Spetner (Ph.D. Physics - MIT)
Resources:
Lee Spetner - Not By Chance
John Sanford - Genetic Entropy
Michael Behe - The Edge Of Evolution
Answers In Genesis web site
Related Blogs
- Related Blogs on Mutations and Information; Genetic Entropy
« Lost your Job? Now What? | Home | Cary Williams House Recovery, Person Co., NC »
Comments
“The neo-Darwinians would like us to believe that large evolutionary changes can result from a series of small events if there are enough of them. But if these events all lose information they can’t be the steps in the kind of evolution the neo-Darwin theory is supposed to explain Whoever thinks macroevolution can be made by mutations that lose information is like the merchant who lost a little money on every sale but thought he could make it up on volume.” Dr. Lee Spetner (Ph.D. Physics - MIT)
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.